[LETTERS] The end of dissent

Julian Assange, of WikiLeaks, has exposed

the lies, deceit and hypocrisy of the

world’s leaders, and because of this he is being

hounded like a fox. U.S. politicians have

called for his head, literally. They have labeled

him a threat to world peace, and a “terrorist”

among other things. Sarah Palin, that woman

from Alaska who thought that Africa was a

country, has accused him of “treason” even

though he is not a U.S. citizen, and therefore

cannot be guilty of such a crime. Mike Huckabee,

an American politician who can play

guitar and doesn’t believe in evolution, has

called for his execution.

The inability to face the truth is, of course,

not limited to the U.S. If you anger the Chinese

they will toss you in jail and throw away

the key. Do the same in Saudi Arabia and they

will simply kill you. But in countries such as

the U.S., traditionally seen as a model of democracy

and bastion of free speech, the recent

trend to control information is disturbing. As

Assange admits, the U.S. “is becoming more

closed.”

Distinguished MIT linguist Noam Chomsky,

author of more than 100 books, had this

to say: The WikiLeaks cables reveal a “profound

hatred for democracy on the part of our

political leadership.” Posting on the Christian

Science Monitor’s Web site, in response to an

article about Julian Assange, Jacob Stephens

wrote: “WAR IS PEACE. FREEDOM IS

SLAVERY. IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH.” He

then added: “Big brother is becoming a reality

and, quite frankly, it’s utterly terrifying.”

He was, of course, quoting from the novel

“1984,” by George Orwell. This book is about

the future, or was when it was written more

than 50 years ago. The author paints a bleak

portrait of how the government spins the facts

to such a degree that nobody knows up from

down or truth from lie. That time has finally

come.

We are here to talk about the end of dissent,

and how that is a direct result of government

efforts, mainly those of the U.S., but also

those of other countries, to persecute those

that simply want to publish the truth. We all

remember what happened to South Korean

blogger Minerva when he predicted a bad

economy. He got thrown in jail.

Why is the U.S. so eager to prosecute Assange?

Perhaps “mysix,” also posting on the

CSM Web site, can explain. He wrote: “America

has tried to control the world and information

flow for far too long. Congratulations to

Julian Assange for having the courage and

fortitude to challenge Goliath. The age of the

Cold War is over and while there is still espionage,

I would be willing to bet a lot of this

so called classified information shows the

U.S. for what it truly is and how it really operates.

For a country which cries foul at any

other entity’s lack of transparency America

should try it. It’s about time someone unveils

the meek wizard behind the curtains.”

But, as Assange himself admits, Wikileaks

is not merely interested in establishing transparency;

it wants justice. And that road to justice

is bumpy and paved with dissent. For

WikiLeaks, it means hard times ahead.

Rick Ruffin, born in Brazil of American parents

and now living in Donghae, South Korea.

*Letters and commentaries for publication

should be addressed “Letters to the Editor.”

E-mailed letters should be sent to eopinion@

joongang.co.kr.