Editorials
Bus housing idea deepens Seoul supply backlash (KOR)
A ruling party lawmaker’s proposal to turn retired buses into youth housing has intensified criticism that the government lacks credible answers to the Seoul area housing crunch.
President Lee Jae Myung speaks during the National Debate on Real Estate Policy held at KBS in Yeouido, western Seoul, on July 23.
JOINT PRESS CORPS
As the housing shortage in the Seoul metropolitan area deepens, a senior lawmaker from the ruling Democratic Party (DP) has come under fire after proposing that decommissioned buses be converted into housing for young people. On Friday, Rep. Hwang Hee of the DP cited Amsterdam’s practice of converting ships into homes and suggested remodeling retired buses into short-term housing for young people near university campuses. His argument was that because the government’s housing supply measures may take time to materialize, “bus houses” could serve as an immediate alternative that would be inexpensive and quick to provide.
The proposal, however, was met almost instantly with questions about its feasibility and angry accusations that young people were being treated like refugees. Facing a fierce backlash on social media, Hwang explained that he had merely been offering an idea and deleted the post. The DP also moved to contain the damage, asking the public to regard the episode as little more than a “slight mishap.” Yet given the ruling camp’s recent failure to present a clear solution to the worsening housing supply crunch beyond curbing demand and raising taxes, it is fair to ask whether the episode can really be dismissed as a mere gaffe.
The metropolitan housing market is now locked in a “triple surge,” with prices rising not only for home purchases but also for jeonse (long-term lease) and monthly rents. Young people and lower-income households squeezed by the severe shortage of rental housing are reluctantly turning to buy relatively affordable apartments, often stretching their finances to do so. Those who cannot afford even that are being pushed farther away from the Seoul metropolitan area, spreading the upward pressure on housing prices across the entire region.
The government has also announced plans to unveil additional housing supply measures. The problem is that even the major sites designated under last September 7 package and this year’s January 26 measures have made little progress, hampered by opposition from local residents and difficulties in coordinating with local governments. Despite the gravity of the situation, the government and ruling party still appear remarkably complacent.
They have effectively sidelined reconstruction and redevelopment of old apartments, among the most realistic channels for increasing housing supply, while pushing ahead with tax reforms that could further aggravate the rental housing shortage. Under these circumstances, can the market possibly take seriously the government’s pledge of "we will supply houses no matter what"?
The metropolitan housing market is heading toward an unprecedented crisis. The ruling camp should fundamentally rethink its misguided policy direction, including tighter regulations on reconstruction and redevelopment and higher property holding and capital gains taxes. Above all, it must devote every effort to producing realistic measures that can actually put more homes on the market.
‘닥공’한다더니…뭐 하다 버스하우스까지 나오나
수도권 주거난이 심화하는 가운데 여당 중진 의원이 폐기된 버스를 청년 주거 시설로 쓰자는 제안을 했다가 거센 반발을 사고 있다. 황희 더불어민주당 의원은 지난 7일 네덜란드 암스테르담에서 선박을 리모델링해 주택으로 활용하는 사례를 언급하며 폐기되는 버스를 리모델링해 대학가 청년의 단기 주거 공간으로 제공하자고 제안했다. 정부 공급 대책의 속도가 더딜 수 있으니, 비용도 적게 들고 신속히 공급할 수 있는 ‘버스하우스’가 당장 대안이 될 수 있다는 주장이었다. 하지만 소셜미디어에 이 글이 게시되자마자 현실성에 대한 의문이 제기된 것은 물론 청년을 난민 취급하느냐는 반발이 잇따랐다. 거센 역풍에 본인은 ‘아이디어 차원’이었다고 해명하며 글을 삭제했고, 민주당도 “해프닝으로 봐 달라”며 진화에 나섰다. 하지만 심각한 주택 공급 절벽 속에서 수요 억제와 세금 강화 외에 뚜렷한 대책을 내놓지 못하고 있는 최근 여권의 상황을 보면 이를 단순한 해프닝으로만 볼 수 있을지 의문이다.
현재 수도권 주택 시장에선 매매가는 물론 전세와 월세까지 오르는 ‘트리플 강세’ 현상이 굳어지고 있다. 심각한 전월세난에 내몰린 청년층과 서민들이 울며 겨자 먹기로 중저가 아파트 매입에 나서고 있지만, 그럴 여유도 없는 계층은 다시 외곽으로 떠밀려 나가며 집값 상승이 수도권 전체로 확산하고 있다.
정부도 추가 공급 대책 발표를 예고한 상태다. 문제는 지난해 9·7 대책과 올해 1·29 대책에서 내놓은 주요 공급 대상지조차 지역민의 반발과 지자체와의 협의 난항으로 별다른 진척을 보이지 않고 있다는 것이다. 이런 엄중한 상황에서도 정부와 여당의 태도는 여전히 안이해 보인다. 현실적인 공급 통로 중 하나인 재건축·재개발 활성화와 규제 완화는 사실상 배제한 데다, 전월세난을 더욱 가중할 우려가 큰 세제개편안을 밀어붙이고 있다. 이래서야 정부가 외치는 ‘닥공(닥치고 공급)’의 진정성을 시장이 받아들일 수 있겠나. 지금 수도권 부동산 시장은 사상 최악으로 치닫고 있다. 여권은 재건축·재개발 규제, 보유세·양도세 강화 등 잘못된 정책 기조를 전면 수정하고, 현실적인 공급 대책 마련에 총력을 기울이기 바란다.
This article was originally written in Korean and translated by a bilingual reporter with the help of generative AI tools. It was then edited by a native English-speaking editor. All AI-assisted translations are reviewed and refined by our newsroom.